Sunday, October 3, 2010

ON TIME GRADUATION RATES WE CAN DO BETTER

On October 1st, staff writers with the Virginian Pilot reported the graduation rates of schools and districts in the Hampton Roads area.  Suffolk’s on-time graduation rate for the 2009-2010 school year is 79.8%.  This means that we are successful with four of the five students we serve in terms of graduation from high school within four years.  This also means we have about 20% of our students who are NOT graduating on time.  
What can we do to help ensure that more of our students are successful in our schools?  Staff in Suffolk have already identified a number of things they are working on – better record keeping, after-school classes, and truancy and dropout prevention programs.  And that’s all good. But if we wait until High School to solve this problem we've waited too long.

Here are examples of what I would like to see to help ensure more of our students graduate on time.
  1. Establish an accountability system that helps us with the picture of a student’s success throughout their enrollment in Suffolk Public Schools. 
  2. This accountability system should help us identify students who are at risk much earlier than high school.  As low as kindergarten, make sure we identify students who struggle as readers and/or have poor school attendance.  Immediately put supports in place for these students.  Look for other markers as well.  We need to know who is overage in their grade levels.  We need to know which students haven’t yet been successful with Algebra by the end of the 8th grade.  We need to know who is not reading on grade level K-12.  We simply must identify these students in order to help them.  And this cannot wait until high school.  We also need to ensure that all of our students can read by the end of the third grade – a marker for success throughout the rest of the child’s school career.
  3. Increase the focus on literacy in all grade levels and all subject areas.  By the fourth grade, we should be moving from learning to read to reading to learn.  I'd want us to check our entire curriculum to ensure that we have systematically integrated literacy into all of the content areas.  Why literacy?  It's the key to successful learning and acquiring deep knowledge.
  4.  I also want to make sure we don’t water down the curriculum for our struggling students.  This can happen unintentionally and often does.
  5. Ensure that our professional development programs address the needs of our struggling students.  We improve in our profession when we are learning what we need to build a solid education for our students.  There are different strategies for different issues – and we want our teachers to have the best in their toolkits.
  6. Place a greater emphasis on students in our middle schools, where early interventions are key to success in high school.
  7. Make decisions that lead to higher student achievement for all students.  Support staff and administrators in designing differentiated schedules for students, based on their needs.  If we get a student in middle school who is not reading on grade level, then let’s make sure we give that student the time and structures to learn to read. 
As you can see, dealing with the graduation rate is a system-wide issue and needs to be solved in a district-wide way.

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why is Wahlstrom wasting her time running as a school board candidate? We need her to be the superintendent of schools for Suffolk!

Anonymous said...

And the Coach's playbook is closed? Its third and and long Coach.Whats the call Coach?
We are starting to see a "general manager" with ideas and leadership skills.I dont think right now the Coach and his team including the Riverview "cheerleaders" can deal with the new "rookie"

Or is this a trick play by the coach? Debroah's election could and might help increase graduation rates, in which more class rings, motar board hats and robes will be needed right? Hmmmmmmmmm? Nawwww.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like very positive goals and achievable, and with the proper amount of work you may reach these goals as you see them.
If you get the chance I wish you well.

Anonymous said...

What bugs me is that Debranski is far behind Wahlstrom in smarts but way ahead in education and an inside track because he peddles caps, gowns, and school rings to students, a very cozy relationship. The teachers ought to go for Wahlstrom because she understands the frustration of teachers and how to remedy many of their problem.

Anonymous said...

Want to bet that the status quo will be the vote of the day? I want MS Wahlstrom, but can see Debranski winning because most just do not care!

Anonymous said...

Great ideas and worthy of merit to Ms. Wahlstrom for recognizing the fundemental issues impeding progress at the SPS. The next step is to get her message out however and wherever possible. Meetings, debates, civic groups, clubs, etc.. Campaign signs do matter and yes they influence voters with name recognition when the enter the voting booth.

Anonymous said...

I would like Mr. Debranski, who is running for school board as an incumbent, provide "IS" with information about qualifications to sit on such an important board. I HAVE HEARD NOTHING ABOUT HIS IDEAS FOR PROGRESS OR CONTRIBUTIONS TO DATE. APPARENTLY HE FIGURES HE CAN'T LOSE. HOW COULD HE MEASURE UP TO DR. WAHLSTROM?

Anonymous said...

It is quite possible that Debra Wahlstrom knows more about how to educate children than the rest of the board together. Up to this date the board has not solved even one school problem. Wahlstrom has more than likely written a book about every one of them.

Anonymous said...

Anon 9:30 you are correct about Mrs. Wahlstrom. However as we saw in the last local election the best candidate for mayor didn't receive the popular vote. I thought Debranski was such an awful speaker and a shallow thinker he would have recognized his limitations and instead of shaming himself and his supporters again he would have withdrawn from future contests. Apparently economics, power and entitlement must something to do with him running again.

Anonymous said...

Anon 958
Debranski will offer some commentary. To his already known backers at social gatheings.And then they will cut their checks.

Anonymous said...

Didn't the Suffolk Republican Party support Pretlow in 03 and Clason in 09. They also supported Wahlstrom when she ran for Mayor in 08? IS is now supporting her for the School Board. mikeduman commented on another post on this blog, that he was endorsed by the GOP but suddenly on October 7th lost it for an inexplicable reason. My how politics and this media forum make strange bedfellows.

Anonymous said...

I'm not so sure about the so-called GOP endorsement of Mrs Martin. Years ago the Suffolk GOP pledged not to make endorsements in City Council elections since to do so might create a Hatch Act violation at the time for Mr Miltier, and the GOP didn't want to create such undesired conflicts against any good candidate and vowed to stay out of non-partisan Council elections.

Mrs Martin candidacy is making a mockery of conflict of interest in our community, starting with her inexplicable omission from her materials of her Housing Authority and Cultural Arts involvents and now exploding into name calling, acceptance of Secection 8 landlord donations and using the SCCA by implying its Board and members and volunteers support her and agree to jeopardize their community respect by supporting her.

Maybe she has a few votes, but we're running out of rocks to look under to find them. She needs to withdraw and let Mr Duman nominate her for the Beautification Commission or somewhere that is less likely to be ackward for those she solicits or implies are backing her somehat shallow positions and elite attitudes.

Anonymous said...

Debra,

It was nice to talk with you at the Peanut Fest about our schools and the lack of proper administration thereof.

You have my vote and I ask my other Suffolk citizens to do like wise and vote for this talented and smart person for our School Board.

Ms Whalstrom is really the only choice and a good one!

Sign me, an Informed Voter

Anonymous said...

The SB that sits now are the only ones who can see to it that Wahlstrom wont have the seat of Super. With those odds the only way she will be able to contribute is to be elected. The only thing that is in her way is the coach and his game plan has been a losing one for way to long.It is 4th and long and the voters need to punt him out of the stadium

Anonymous said...

By far, Whalstrom is the better candiate, but the "OLD Suffolk" centric crowd will do all they can to keep Debranski in office because they feel he is one of them. This is why Suffolk will always be a sickly city with few ideas or success. To bad as Suffolk could be a bright spot to live in compared to may areas like Norfolk and VA Beach. Chesapeke is OK, but is corupt to the bone.

It would be nice to see Whalstrom win and I am hopeful.

Anonymous said...

Sad to say that I don't live in the Suffolk voting borough or I'd definitely be voting for Ms. Wahlstrom also. Is there anybody running in any of the other boroughs who would bring some new ideas to the SB--and more votes for overturning the status quo which has brought Suffolk Public Schools to the abysmal state they wallow in today? Just looking for some light and hope but nobody on the School Board today offers any? Open for some recommendations from anybody who knows any of the competitors running in other boroughs!

Anonymous said...

I think Wahlstrom is great for Suffolk Public Schools. Too bad I don't live in her borough but if I did I would vote for her and tell my family and friends to also do the same. None of them live in her borough either so the best we can do is cheer her on from the sidelines and wish her well.

Deb's Education Corner