Saturday, February 20, 2010

The Public Education Funding Model Was Already Broken. The Overspending Induced Recession Just Made This Fact Impossible to Hide!

The local papers are full of wailing and gnashing of teeth over Governor McDonnell’s proposed budget cuts to public school spending but nobody is suggesting how to deal with a multi-billion dollar difference in the revenue coming in and the continued overspending! Those living at the expense of others very predictably demand that the municipal and Commonwealth spending sprees of the past continue! At the same time, those of us paying the bills have seen the real values of our homes fall by a minimum of 20% to as high as over 30%, yet municipal assessors continue to cherry pick the high value sales and generate assessments based on these "comparables” that defy economic reality while ignoring all the foreclosures and the bankruptcy induced distressed sales that end up at a fraction of the original sale price. How is this any different than an individual getting to represent his own financial condition as healthy while ignoring all the bounced checks? It doesn’t take a CPA to figure out that the over-assessments of private property continue only to fund continued municipal over-spending using revenue generated by those assessments!


Clearly public school Districts and School Boards have continued to spend the public's money as if it were Monopoly money. Suffolk chose to build a $46 million dollar Kings Fork High School when there was a competing bid on the table that would have cost less than $35 million. They do it all the time. Similarly, every Teacher’s Union and public school District that I am aware of shuns any discussion of merit pay to reward and retain best performers while also signaling deadwood and the ill performing that perhaps they need to be looking into a different career. Even more absurd, every School District insists on raising pay for everybody in the system by the same percentage rate even thought this fails to put additional funds where they are needed most. But the education bureaucrats making over $100,000 also end up with a numerically higher pay hike that is totally unjustified and numerically dwarfs the pay hikes of all the Special Education, science, math, history, and English teachers who are directly responsible for retention, graduation, and disciplinary achievements of the school system. They are the individuals who are working the hardest and making the difference—not those who discovered early on that all the lucrative rewards in public education go to those who manage to escape the classroom! Every fat education bureaucrat or School Board member sporting a $500 suit is willing to proclaim to anyone willing to listen that there is simply no way to determine performance differences between individuals working for them. But when every leader in a successful private sector firm has been doing exactly this for many decades, this only further highlights the total lack of intellectual honesty and managerial competence at all levels of public education today! Little of the performance and management philosophy coming out of public education bureaucrats and teachers unions today passes the straight face test. It is developed by people who have learned nothing more than how to justify increased spending every year without tying revenue to performance! In richer areas where education waste inflicts less pain on the community, the paying public have larger concerns to deal with. But in many parts of Hampton Roads, and especially in Suffolk, continued lousy education at ever increasing costs has gone beyond painful to intolerable! And in a recession there is no place to hide the ugly truth. It’s not a funding problem; it’s a performance problem. And since most Districts have been unable to improve performance with greatly increased funding over the past decades, cutting that funding will only force School Districts to cut spending where it won’t make a difference. The unfortunate fact is that most public school educators today have no idea where they have been wasting all the money because they have never successfully tied funding to performance in the first place. Sucks to be them!!

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

This Post by Mr. Mears points out the just how inept our school board and school administration is. They never heard of the phrase, "Just do it. Mears has all but given them a map.

Anonymous said...

And Mears points how why the "IS" candidate for School Board,Debra Wahlstrom, would be a huge step up.

Anonymous said...

Anyone interested in Suffolk Public Schools should memorize what George Mears wrote. Cut it out and send it to the bureaucrats soaking up your tax dollars and accomplishing very little. We have got to make big changes in our School Board if we are ever to redirect Liverman.

Anonymous said...

Damn George! Why sugar coat everything?! So the premise seems to be that since throwing tens of millions of dollars at education hasn't improved anything, pulling millions away can't hurt either! Valid assumption in a rational world but you know that the School Boards will insist on taking the cuts where they will inflict the MOST harm since they too only know how to play the Money is Everything (even though we have nothing to show for it) game! won't cut fluff

It's the economy said...

The main problem is that most of the board members have never run a business. They base everything on feelings (as liberals do).

The current board members have never had to balance a budget, have never had to deal with making a payroll.

Mrs. Wahlstrom is a gift from the Lord - seriously. She has experience in the classroom, school administration, and has run a business.

She knows that when you expect future shortfalls, you make plans now, not a year later.

How many of us do that? How many of us decide not to make fiscal preparation before the storm? If you know that in the future you will be dealing with fewer dollars for your budget, you start preparing early to soften to blow.

Our current school board spends every dime it has when it has it, and then complains later down the road when there is a budget shortfall. It's like they're using some form of voodoo economics.

Anonymous said...

As for school systems overspending, I agree. There is waste to cut from this "sacred cow". However, how come people love to complain but never show up at sessions designed to allow public comment?

If it is such a big concern to people, why not take the time to voice your concerns to the board. I will agree that it may not make any difference to the board but do you really think complaining to like-minded people on blogs such as this will change the minds of people outside your inner circle? Firing up the troops is all well and good but getting a message out to those on the "outside" is more critical.

If you save all of your talking points for election time, it is usually too late to reach the people you need to reach to make the change(s) you deem necessary for proper running of the schools and/or city.

In other words, if someone blogs in the woods, does it make a sound?

Roger A. Leonard said...

George,

You have distilled down to a few paragraphs, what is wrong with how our schools in Suffolk have been and are run. Your claim that just standing back and throwing our money at it does not work, or we would have the best schools money can buy... The issue now is just how far and fast can we cut the bills? It would seem that a funding cut of almost 30 to 40 percent is a realistic start. That would put us back to about were we were or more, from when the big reassessments started. Reality will hurt some, but it seems the only way to survive!

Thanks George for a well reasoned statment that one and all can understand! I agree that if just money was going to fix things, then they have had more than enough over the last six years to do the job. Money must not be the positive variable claimed for higher school perfomance and in these lean and hard times so, IT IS TIME TO TRIM THE FAT and fast!

Roger A. Leonard
Suffolk...

Deme Panagopulos said...

George very well written! The School Board for years has been an instument of the administration. Largely they have been informed of decisions not consulted. Nor oddly, do they demand they be consulted. They have failed to shape an effective education policy, deferring action, settling for the status quo or following the path of least resistance. The budget procedure is an excellent example. A rubber stamp approval of the administration's that forces the City Council to make the impossible, possible.

No longer can the citizens afford to stand outside and throw rocks at the window to get their attention of the grave necessity that mandates they make changes. Change cannot exist unless someone is willing to bring it about. Someone must be willing to be the disciplined advocate. The slate of incumbents is challenged by only one such person Debra Wahlstrom. She is an outstanding candidate for the position. We need three more like her for the task at hand. So I ask who is willing to run. Who will join Debra.

Deborah Wahlstrom said...

I would like to share the copy of a letter I sent to the School Board on the 12th. It represents my first view of budget ideas, but there's more to think about and suggest.

This comment section does not allow me to paste a link, but I do have the URL below. Just copy and paste it into your browser to download my Letter to the Board.

http://insidesuffolk.community.officelive.com/Documents/letter-suffolk-school-board-budget.pdf

The more of us who share ideas and suggestions here - as George has so capably done - the better the decision-making input for the Board.

G.H. Mears ME, MBA said...

If you haven't taken the time to read over Dr. Wahlstrom's letter to the School Board, please do so. It doesn't get down into the weeds but for anyone serious about looking for where to find savings facing an austere budget, she lays out a road map for where to find savings that impact the children the least.

However, I suspect that these may be the last places that public school officials will be looking to find! They are too invested in public and municipal manipulation and funding games so they are more likely to be looking for cuts that will generate most public outrage. To many public educators and Teachers' Unions, children and their parents are are only pawns to be manipulated to win a larger share of public funding.

Anonymous said...

I am scratching my head why a candidate would provide the School Board with options how and where to cut the budget. It undermines their election prospects and gives the incumbents wiggle room to take credit for someone else's idea. They have placed themselves in this dire predicament, let them find a way out or choose not to run. Some may say it's harsh treatment, others would call it tough love. Debra in a city that prides itself for lack of innovation, keep it to yourself until you are elected.

Anonymous said...

Not always does the brightest most innovative, capable and articulate candidate win elections. Just look who we elected Mayor and you'll understand.

Anonymous said...

I like the Feb. 22 at 8:47 comment. How true. How about the guy on council that has made a mockery of the English language. How many times has he been reelected? What an embarrassment to this city.

Anonymous said...

Borrowing Democrat party leader quotes; he is articulate and bright and clean and a nice looking African-American with no Negro dialect unless he wanted to have one. When are people in his borough going to wake up.

Deb's Education Corner