There must be something magic about the split single word “status quo” because Suffolk has endured it for what seems decades. In the army we changed socks every day if the enemy gave us time. Mr. Brown will one day slump over on the dais having done what for his borough, race, or people? He, like others, receives token gifts from organized homebuilders and does what with the money? No
need for campaign signs or handouts. He knows he can’t be beat by the average person running against him. Probably the same could be said about Bennett and Curtiss. The folks in their boroughs are content to believe their rep is the key to neighborhood physical improvements and the handy new Social Services building will keep a bright light shining on them until death demands a replacement. There is nothing wrong with that. That’s how politicians stay afloat, give folks just enough and appear to fight expensive projects in other boroughs.

Mr. Varney, a quality gentleman, took on tough old Gardy who still wields enough charm and wit to beat the odds in his bailiwick. Varney was close and many hope he will be around for another challenge. But Gardy is hardly status quo, that requires at least two terms.
Voters will forgive most anything but a lousy dirty trick letter falsely putting down a good man. When that happens there should be an immediate resignation because it reflects on not only the opponent but other folks connected to the letter sender. The word for that kind of activity is “Shame on you.” It’s a different story if one is forced to a last ditch refute by getting out such a letter to defend oneself.
One eye opener was candidate Martin's ability to find financial backers, an average contribution of $400. $20,000 from 50 contributors. Her opponent Duman paid his own expenses.
And it is a shame that one borough was not sensible enough to place a professional on the school board. Oh well, another year of almost the same status standstill.